For a visual anthropology of tourism: The critical use of visual methodologies and materials

Authors

  • Humberto Martins UTAD-CETRAD; CRIA-ISCTE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2016.14.034

Keywords:

visual anthropology, tourism, digital culture, subjectivity

Abstract

This article discusses the uses of visual means in an anthropology that studies tourism. The text reflects on the proliferation of media and recording, production and distribution tools of technologized visual images and proposes an approach that considers production conditions, the meanings of the images and their different receptions. The 'digital age' is also discussed, particularly its transformative potential of reception, production and dissemination, together with new forms of authorship, the velocity of contents circulation and the revision of the boundaries between real and unreal, documentary and fiction, science and art. The background for my argument is that of a world that, facilitating and stimulating leisure, mobilities and contemplation and consumption of the different and the beautiful (landscape, heritage, monumental) does not cease to produce a (digital) imagery 'divide'; i.e. unequal accesses to visual representation tools of the 'others', of themselves and of the world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banks, Marcus 1998. “Visual Anthropology: Image, Objet and Interpretation”, in Jon Prosser (ed.), Image-Based Research, London and Bristol: Falmer Press, 9-23.

Banks, Marcus e Ruby, Jay 2011. “Made to Be Seen: Historical Perspectives on Visual Anthropology”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 1-18

Ball, Michael 1998. “Remarks on Visual Competence as an integrant Part of Ethnographic Fieldwork Practice: The Visual Availability of Culture” in Jon Prosser (ed.), Image-Based Research, London and Bristol, Falmer Press: 131-147

Baker, Jody 2002. “Production and Consumption of Wilderness in Algonquin Park” Space & Culture vol. 5: 3, 198–210

Bell, David 2011. “On the Net: Navigating the World Wide Web”, in Creeber, G. e Martin, R. (eds.), Digital Culture: Understanding New Media, Berkshire e New York, Open University Press, 30-38.

Berger, John 1973. [1972], Ways of Seeing, London, BBC Books

Campos, Ricardo 2011. “Imagem e tecnologias visuais em pesquisa social: tendências e desafios”, Análise Social, XLVI (199): 237-259

Creeber, G. e Martin, R. 2009. (eds.), Digital Culture: Understanding New Media, Berkshire e New York, Open University Press

Clifford, James 1997. Routes; Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge e Londres, Harvard University Press

Cubitt, Sean 2009. “Case Study: Digital Aesthetics” in Creeber, G. e Martin, R. (eds.), Digital Culture: Understanding New Media, Berkshire e New York, Open University Press, 23-29.

Edwards, Elisabeth 2011. “Tracing Photography”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 159-189.

Farnell, Brenda 2011. “Theorizing ‘the Body’ in Visual Culture”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 136-158

Ginsburg, Faye 2011. “Native Intelligence. A Short History of Debates on Indigenous Media and Ethnographic Film”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 234-255.

Grasseni, Cristina 2011. “Skilled Visions: Toward an Ecology of Visual Inscriptions” in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.) Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, the University of Chicago Press

Griffiths, Alison 2002. Wondrous Difference - Cinema, Anthropology & Turn-of-the-Century Visual Culture, New York, Columbia UP

Grimshaw, Anna 2005. “Eyeing the Field: New Horizons for Visual Anthropology”, in A. Grimshaw and A. Ravetz (eds.) Visualizing Anthropology, Bristol and Portland, Intellect, 17-30. -2001 “Teaching Visual Anthropology: Notes From the Field”, Ethnos, vol. 66: 2, 237-258.

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. 1997. “Discipline as Practice: The Field As Site, Method and Location in Anthropology”, in A. Gupta, A. and J. Ferguson, eds., Anthropological Locations, boundaries and grounds of a field science, Berkeley, Los Angeles e London, University of California Press, 1-46.

Herzfeld, Michael 2011. “Ethical and Epistemic Reflections on/of Anthropological Vision”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 313-333.

Hills, Matt 2009. “Participatory Culture: mobility, interactivity and identity” in Creeber, G. e Martin, R. (eds.), Digital Culture: Understanding New Media, Berkshire e New York, Open University Press, 107-116

Jay, Martin 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth Century French Thought, Berkely, University of California Press.

Martins, Humberto 2013. “Sobre o lugar e os usos das imagens na antropologia: notas críticas em tempos de audiovisualização do mundo”, Etnográfica, vol. 17 (2), 395-419.

Martins, Humberto 2011. “Etnografias Visuais: (im)possibilidades de uma antropologia visual aplicada”, in Pedro Silva, José Portela e Octávio Sacramento (eds.) Etnografia e intervenção social: por uma praxis reflexiva, Lisboa, Colibri, pp. 85-109.

Martins, Humberto 2010. “Notas breves de uma visita ao futuro do primeiro rei de Portugal com comentário ao catálogo da exposição ‘D.Afonso - Marca Registada’, Etnográfica, 14(2), pp.397-404.

Martins, Humberto 2005. “Will the rocks crumble one day? Past and Present in the Portuguese Galician frontier - Border Relations and memories”, Phd Dissertation with multimedia DVD (documentary, short clips, photography and text), University of Manchester (UK)

Metz, Christian 1977. The Imaginary Signifier – Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Mirzoeff, N. 2006. “On Visuality”, Journal of Visual Culture, 5 (1), 53-79.

Mirzoeff, N. 1998. “What is Visual Culture?” in Nicholas Mirzoeff (ed.) Visual Culture: An Introduction, Oxford and New York, Routledge, 3-13.

Mitchell, W.J.T. 2002. “Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture”, Journal of Visual Culture, 1(2): 165-181.

Okely, Judith 2001. “Visualism and Landscape: Looking and Seeing in Normandy”, Ethnos, 66(1): 99-120.

Pereiro, X. 2015. Antropología del turismo indígena en Guna Yala (Panamá). La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna. Tese doutoral sob a orientação de Agustín Santana. Ver http://hdl.handle.net/10348/2934 - 2012, “El Turismo Indígena Guna (Panamá): imaginarios e regímenes de mentira de las guías turísticas internacionales, Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, 21, 945-962.

Pink, Sarah 2011. “Digital Visual Anthropology”, in Marcus Banks e Jay Ruby (eds.), 2011, Made to Be Seen – Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, Chicago e London, The University of Chicago Press, 209-233.

Pink, Sarah 2008. “Mobilising Visual Ethnography: Making Routes, Making Place and Making Images”, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9: 3.

Pratt, Mary Louise 1992. Imperial Eyes – Travel Writing and Transculturation, London e New York, Routledge.

Ribeiro, José 2004. Antropologia Visual – Da Minúcia do Olhar ao Olhar Distanciado, Porto, Afrontamento

Robinson, M.; Picard, David 2009, “Tourism and photography: magic, memory and world making”, in M. Robinson; D. Picard (orgs.), The Framed World: Tourism, Tourists and Photography. Londres: Ashgate, 1-37.

Rose, Gillian, 2012, Visual Methodologies – An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, London, Sage.

Sampaio, Sofia 2013a. “Turismo como não-turismo: confluências e inflexões do filme turístico em filmes do período (pós-) revolucionário”, UBImuseum: Revista Online do Museu de Lanifícios da Universidade da Beira Interior, 2: 217-228 -2013b, “Estudar o turismo hoje: para uma revisão crítica dos estudos de turismo”, Etnográfica, 17 (1): 167-182.

Santos, Paula M. 2012. “The power of knowledge: tourism and the production of heritage in Porto’s old city”, International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, 5: 1 - 15.

Silva, Maria Cardeira da 2003. “Video Tours”, Etnográfica, Vol. VII (2), 451-458.

Sturken, Marita and Cartwright, Lisa 2001. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Urry, John 2002. The Tourist Gaze, London: Sage.

Zoetll, Peter Anton 2011. “Aprender cinema, aprender antropologia”, Etnográfica, 15(1): 185-191.

Wright, Terence 2012. “Visual Culture, Ethnography and Interactive Media”, in Kockel, U. et al., (eds.) A Companion to the Anthropology of Europe, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 497-518.

Published

2016-05-02

How to Cite

Martins, H. (2016). For a visual anthropology of tourism: The critical use of visual methodologies and materials. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2016.14.034

Issue

Section

Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted: 18% 
33%
Days to publication 
391
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Instituto Universitario de Investigación Social y Turismo. Universidad de La Laguna (España) - Instituto Universitario da Maia ISMAI (Portugal)