Aplicación de teorías de comunicación para diseñar técnicas de cumplimiento en la insatisfacción del cliente

Autores/as

  • Jonathan Matusitz
  • Gerald Mark Breen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2011.09.004

Palabras clave:

Argumentación, Consumidores, Insatisfacción, Confianza en sí mismo, Servicio

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es aplicar tres teorías de la comunicación (la teoría de la argu- mentación, la técnica Foot-in-the-Door y la técnica Door-in-the-Face) a la formulación de las quejas que se comunican con eficacia a empleados de empresa y la compensación de producción para el consumidor. Los autores demuestran que la queja no es un procedimiento casual, si las teorías dela comunicación se aplican correctamente. Además, también se hace  hincapié en la importancia de la auto-eficacia, como un componente psicológico, para ilustrar la necesidad de que los demandantes tengan suficiente y verdadera confianza en sí mismos a fin de llevar  cada una de estas teorías a la práctica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Jonathan Matusitz

Assistant Professor in the Nicholson School of Communication at the University of Central Florida. His academic interests are mass media, organizational communication, and communication & technology.

Gerald Mark Breen

Research associate in the Department of Public Affairs at the University of Central Florida. He specializes in health communication, social policy, and media studies.

Citas

Bandura, A. 1977 Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. 1982 Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.

Bandura, A. 1986 Social foundations of thought and action: A socialcognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. 1991 Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision process, 50, 248-287.

Bougie, R., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. 2003 Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: The experience and be- havioral implications of anger and dis- satisfaction in services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 377-393.

Breen, G. M., & Matusitz, J. 2004 The dissatisfied customer: How to achieve the compensation you deserve. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1978 Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 256-289). Cam- bridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1987 Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Chung, H., & Elias, M. 1996 Patterns of adolescent involvement in problem behaviors: Relationship to self-efficacy, social competence, and life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(6), 771-784.

Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. 1975 Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the- face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206-215.

Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R.J. 1999 Classical rhetoric for the modern student. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dillard, J. P. 1991 The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 283-288.

Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. 1984 Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10(4), 461-488.

Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. L. 1966 Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the- door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.

Garrett, D. E., Bradford, J. L., Meyers, R. A., & Becker, J. 1989 Issues management and organizational accounts: An analysis of corporate responses to accusations of unethical business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 507-520.

Garrett, D. E., Meyers, R. A., & Camey, J. 1991 Interactive complaint communication: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 4, 62-79.

Garrett, D. E., Meyers, R. A., & West, L. 1997 Sex differences and consumer com- plaints: Do men and women communicate differently when they complain to customer service representatives? Journal of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 10, 116-130.

Giles, H., & Powesland, P. 1975 Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press. Giles, H., & Smith, P. M. 1979 Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In H. Giles, & R. St. Clair (Eds.). Language and social psychology (pp. 45-65). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kyriakidou, O., & Gore J. 2005 Benchmarking organizational culture in hospitality, tourism and leisure SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(3), 192-206.

Mayberry, K. J., & Golden, R.E. 1996 For argument’s sake: A guide to wri- ting effective arguments. New York: Harpers Collins.

McGuire, W. J. 1968 The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psycho- logy (pp.136-314). New York: Addison- Wesley.

Meyers, R. A. 1989a Persuasive arguments theory: A test of assumptions. Human Communication Research, 15, 357-381.

Meyers, R. A. 1989b Testing persuasive arguments theory’s predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence. Communication Mono- graphs, 56, 112-132.

Meyers, R. A., & Garrett, D. E. 1993 The dissatisfaction-argument link: An initial qualitative analysis of consumer complaints. In R. McKerrow (Ed.), Argument and the postmodern challenge: Proceedings of the eighth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 226-234). Annandale, VA: SCA. Miller, M. D., & Levine, T. R. 1996 Persuasion. In M. B. Salwen, & D.W. Stack (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 261-276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Singh, J. 1988 Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: Definitional and Taxonomical issues. Journal of Marketing, 52, 93-107.

Singh, J. 1990 Voice, exit, and negative word-of- mouth behaviors: An investigation across three service categories. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 1-15.

Singh, J., & Wilkes, R. E. 1996 When consumers complain: A path analysis of the key antecedents of consumer complaint response estimates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 350-365.

Susskind, A. M. 2000 Efficacy and outcome expectations related to customer complaints about service experiences. Communication Research, 27(3), 353-378.

Walker, M. A., Whittaker, S. J., Stent, A., Maloor, P., Moore, J., Johnston, M., & Vasireddy, G. 2004 Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue. Cognitive Science, 28(5), 811-840.

Publicado

2011-01-18

Cómo citar

Matusitz, J., & Breen, G. M. (2011). Aplicación de teorías de comunicación para diseñar técnicas de cumplimiento en la insatisfacción del cliente. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 9(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2011.09.004