Domestic Tourism in Uruguay: a matrix approach

  • Magdalena Domínguez Pérez
Palabras clave: inbound tourism, trips, matrix, attraction coefficients

Resumen

In this paper domestic tourism in Uruguay is analyzed by introducing an Origin-Destination matrix approach, and an attraction coefficient is calculated. We show that Montevideo is an attractive destination but to itself (even if it emits more trips than it receives), and the Southeast region is the main destination. Another important outcome is the importance of intra-regional patterns, associated to trips to bordering departments. The findings provide destination managers with practical knowledge useful for reducing seasonality and attracting more domestic tourists throughout the year, as well as to provide more a better service offer, that attracts both usual visitors and new ones from competitive destinations.

Citas

Amaral, E., Alves, A. and Rabahy, W. 2013. Domestic tourism and regional inequality in Brasil. Tourism Economics, 19, 1, pp. 173-186.

Archer, B. 1978. Domestic Tourism as a development factor. Annals of Tourism Research, 5, 1, 126-141.

De la Mata T. and Llano-Verduras, C. 2012. Spatial pattern and domestic tourism: an econometric analysis using inter-regional monetary flows by type of journey. Papers in Regional Science, 91, 2, pp. 437-470.

Deng M. and Athanasopoulos, G. 2011. Modelling Australian domestic and international inbound travel: a spatial-temporal approach. Tourism Management, 32, pp. 1075-1084.

Guardia Gálvez, T., Muro Romero, J. and Such Devesa, M.J. 2014. Measuring and analyzing domestic tourism: the importance of an origin and destination matrix. Tourism Economics, 20, 3, pp. 451-472.

Garin-Muñoz T. 2009. Tourism in Galicia: domestic and foreign demand. Tourism Economics, 15, pp. 753-769.

Larruina, K. 2013. An assessment of the Tourism Impact in the Uruguayan Economy. IV Jornadas Académicas, FCEA, UdelaR. Uruguay.

Llano-Verduras, C. and De la Mata, T. 2009. El comercio interregional en España: una estimación de los flujos bilaterales del sector turismo. ICE, 848, pp. 67-87.

Marrocu E. and Paci, R. 2013, Different tourists to different destinations. Evidence from spatial interaction models. Tourism Management, 39, pp. 71-83.

Martínez García, E. 2002. Regional flows of Domestic Tourism in Spain. Girona, Spain.

Massidda C. and Etzo, I. 2012, The determinants of Italian domestic tourism: a panel data analysis. Tourism Management, 33, pp. 603-610.

Ministry of Tourism 2011. Domestic Tourism Report, 2010. Montevideo, Uruguay.

Ministry of Tourism 2012. Domestic Tourism Report, 2011. Montevideo, Uruguay.

Ministry of Tourism 2013. Domestic Tourism Report, 2012. Montevideo, Uruguay.

Ministry of Tourism 2014. 2013 yearbook. Montevideo, Uruguay.

Otero-Giráldez, M.S., Álvarez-Díaz, M. y González-Gómez, M. 2012. Estimating the long-run effects of socioeconomic and meteorological factors on the domestic tourism demand for Galicia, Spain. Tourism Management, 33, 6, pp. 1301-1308.

Pearce, D. 1993. Domestic Tourism travel patterns in New Zealand. GeoJournal, 29, pp. 225-232.

Rogerson, C. y Lisa, Z. 2005. ‘Sho’t Left’: Changing Domestic Tourism in South Africa. Urban Forum, 16, pp. 88-111.

Seckelmann, A. 2002. Domestic tourism: a chance for regional development in Turkey? Tourism Management, 23, 1, pp. 85-92.

Sindinga, I. 1996. Domestic tourism in Kenya. Annals of Tourism Research, 23, 1, pp. 19-31.

Usach Domingo, J. 1998. Análisis de los flujos interregionales de la demanda turística interna española. Estudios turísticos, 136, pp.27-45.

Zhang, W. 1997. China’s domestic tourism: impetus, development and trends. Tourism Management, 18, 8, pp. 565-571.

Publicado
2016-07-24
Cómo citar
Domínguez Pérez, M. (2016). Domestic Tourism in Uruguay: a matrix approach. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2016.14.053
Sección
Artículos