Analizando el tipo de Coopetición en redes interorganizativas turísticas de Curitiba, Brasil

Autores/as

  • Adriana Fumi Chim-Miki Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-2718
  • Rosa Maria Batista-Canino Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
  • Silvia Sosa-Cabrera Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.055

Palabras clave:

Redes interorganizativas, Ventaja coopetitiva, Curitiba., destino turistico

Resumen

Este artículo presenta un análisis de variables que indican la propensión a relaciones de coopetición, comparando este contexto entre redes horizontales, verticales o integrales del sector turístico. Fueron recabados datos a través de 287 encuestas empresariales y entrevistas con 26 asociaciones del destino turístico Curitiba en Brasil. Se recoge información sobre la percepción que tiene el empresario de su contexto, lo que promueve su participación en las redes asociativas locales. Los resultados muestran muy poca diferencia en la percepción empresarial en las redes. En los tres tipos de redes la coopetición está más basada en competición que en cooperación, indicando que el empresario, sea competidor o complementario, visualiza la obtención de ventajas tanto individuales como colectivas al participar de redes interorganizativas. La cooperación en los ambientes empresariales es una manera de obtener ventajas competitivas individuales, por tanto, todos los participantes son vistos como competidores en busca de beneficios.

 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Badulescu, A.; Badulescu, D. & Borma, A. 2014. Enhancing Cross‑Border Cooperation through Local Actors’ Involvement. The Case of Tourism Cooperation in Bihor (Romania)–Hajdú‑Bihar (Hungary) Euroregion. Lex localis‑Journal of Local Self‑Government, 12 (3), 349‑371.

Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. 2000. Coopetition in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (5), 411‑426.

Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. 2014. Coopetition—Quo vadis? past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43 (2), 180‑188.

Bonache Pérez, J. 1999. El estudio de casos como estrategia de construcción teórica: características, críticas y defensas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 3, 123‑140.

Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. 2015. Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577‑601.

Bouncken, R. B., Clauß, T., & Fredrich, V. 2016. Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: Singular or plural governance? Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 77‑90.

Cheng, E. W.; Li, H. & Love, P. E. D. 2000. Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. Journal of management in engineering, 16 (2), 84‑92.

Chin, K.; Chan, B. L. & Lam, P. 2008. Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management Data Systems, 108 (3‑4), 437‑454.

Chiva Gómez, R. 2001. El estudio de casos explicativo. Una reflexión. Revista de Economía y Empresa, 41, 119‑132.

Coote, L. V.; Forrest, E. J. & Tam, T. W. 2003. An investigation into commitment in non‑Western industrial marketing relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 32 (7), 595‑604.

Cygler, J.; Gajdzik, B. & Sroka, W. 2014. Coopetition as a development stimulator of enterprises in the networked steel sector. Metalurgija, 53 (3), 383‑386.

Czernek, K., & Czakon, W. 2016. Trust‑building processes in tourist coopetition: The case of a Polish region. Tourism Management, 52, 380‑394.

Dagnino, G. & G. Padula 2002. Coopetition strategy. Paper presented at the Second European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Stockholm, May 9‑11

Della Corte, V. & M. Sciarelli 2012. Can coopetition be source of competitive advantage for strategic networks? Corporate Ownership and Control, 10 (1), 363‑379.

Domareski‑Ruiz, T.C. 2015. A dinâmica evolutiva da competitividade do destino turístico Curitiba. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia). Curitiba, Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532‑550.

Eriksson, P. E. 2008. Achieving suitable coopetition in buyer–supplier relationships: the case of AstraZeneca. Journal of Business‑to‑Business Marketing, 15 (4), 425‑454.

Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long‑term orientation in buyer‑seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 1‑19.

Gnyawali, D. R. & Park, B.J.R. 2009. Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47 (3), 308‑330

Hartley, J.F. 1994. Case studies in organizational research, en Casell, C y Symon, G. (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research. Londres, Sage Publications: pp.208‑229.

Lado, A. A.; Boyd, N. G. & Hanlon, S. C. 1997. Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), 110‑141.

Lorgnier, N. & Su, C. J. 2014. Considering coopetition strategies in sport tourism networks: a look at the nonprofit nautical sports clubs on the northern coast of France. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14 (1), 87‑109.

Luo, Y. 2005. Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40 (1), 71‑90.

Kim, S.; Kim, N.; Pae, J. H. & Yip, L. 2013. Cooperate ‘and’ compete: coopetition strategy in retailer‑supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28 (4), 263‑275.

Kylänen, M. & Rusko, R. 2011. Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä‑luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland. European Management Journal, 29 (3), 193‑205.

Kylanen, M. & M.M. Mariani 2012. Unpacking the temporal dimension of coopetition in tourism destinations: Evidence from Finnish and Italian theme parks. Anatolia, 23 (1), 61‑74.

Mayntz, R. 2001. El Estado y la sociedad civil en la gobernanza moderna. Reforma y democracia, 21, 7‑22.

Mohr, J.& Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic management journal, 15 (2), 135‑152.

Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment‑trust theory of relationship marketing. The journal of marketing, 58, 20‑38.

Narus, J. A. & Anderson, J. C. 1987. Distributor contributions to partnerships with manufacturers. Business horizons, 30 (5), 34‑42.

Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. 1976. El diferencial semántico como instrumento de medida. En: Wainerman, C. (ed.). Escalas de medición en ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión.

Porter, M. E. 1974. Consumer behavior, retailer power and performance in consumer goods industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (4), 419‑436.

Porter, M. E. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57 (2), 137‑145.

Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free Press

Ritala, P. 2012. Coopetition strategy ? when is it successful? empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23 (3), 307‑324.

Ritala, P. & Hurmelinna‑Laukkanen, P. 2009. What’s in it for me? creating and appropriating value in innovation‑related coopetition. Technovation, 29 (12), 819‑828.

Ritala, P.; Hurmelinna‑Laukkanen, P., & Blomqvist, K. 2009. Tug of war in innovation‑coopetitive service development. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12 (3), 255‑272.

Sosa‑Cabrera, S. 2003. La génesis y el desarrollo del cambio estratégico: un enfoque dinámico basado en el momentum organizativo. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

Teller, C., Alexander, A., & Floh, A. 2016. The impact of competition and cooperation on the performance of a retail agglomeration and its stores. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 6‑17.

Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “Coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science (Providence, R.I.),13 ( 2), 179‑190.

Walley, K. 2007. Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37 (2), 11‑31.

Wang, Y. 2008. Collaborative destination marketing: Roles and strategies of convention and visitors bureaus. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (3), 191‑209.

Wallenburg, C. M., & Schäffler, T. 2016. Performance measurement in horizontal LSP cooperation as a field of conflict: the preventive role of collaborative processes. Logistics Research, 9(1), 1‑15.

Wang, Y. & Krakover, S. 2008. Destination marketing: Competition, cooperation or coopetition? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2), 126‑141.

Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research. Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Descargas

Publicado

2018-07-26

Cómo citar

Chim-Miki, A. F., Batista-Canino, R. M., & Sosa-Cabrera, S. (2018). Analizando el tipo de Coopetición en redes interorganizativas turísticas de Curitiba, Brasil. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 16(3), 769-784. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.055

Número

Sección

Artículos

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.