Analyzing the type of Coopetition in tourism interorganizational networks in Curitiba, Brazil

Authors

  • Adriana Fumi Chim-Miki Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-2718
  • Rosa Maria Batista-Canino Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
  • Silvia Sosa-Cabrera Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.055

Keywords:

Inter-organization networks, Tourism Destination, Co-opetition, Co-opetitive advantage, Curitiba.

Abstract

 This paper presents an analysis of the variables that indicate propensity to co-opetition using a comparison of horizontal, vertical or comprehensive networks in the tourism sector. Data was collected from 287 business surveys and 26 interviews with tourism associations in the destination of Curitiba in Brazil. Information is given with respect to the business sector's perception of the local context since this gives rise to their participation in local associative networks. The results show little difference in the entrepreneurial perception levels over the various networks. The three types of co-opetition networks are based more on competition than cooperation, indicating that the business sector, whether they be direct competitors or indirect complements are on the lookout for both individual and collective advantages when they participate in inter-organization networks. Cooperation in a business environment is seen as a way to achieve individual competitive advantage; therefore, all the participants are basically competing for the overall benefits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badulescu, A.; Badulescu, D. & Borma, A. 2014. Enhancing Cross‑Border Cooperation through Local Actors’ Involvement. The Case of Tourism Cooperation in Bihor (Romania)–Hajdú‑Bihar (Hungary) Euroregion. Lex localis‑Journal of Local Self‑Government, 12 (3), 349‑371.

Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. 2000. Coopetition in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (5), 411‑426.

Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. 2014. Coopetition—Quo vadis? past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43 (2), 180‑188.

Bonache Pérez, J. 1999. El estudio de casos como estrategia de construcción teórica: características, críticas y defensas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 3, 123‑140.

Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. 2015. Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577‑601.

Bouncken, R. B., Clauß, T., & Fredrich, V. 2016. Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: Singular or plural governance? Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 77‑90.

Cheng, E. W.; Li, H. & Love, P. E. D. 2000. Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. Journal of management in engineering, 16 (2), 84‑92.

Chin, K.; Chan, B. L. & Lam, P. 2008. Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management Data Systems, 108 (3‑4), 437‑454.

Chiva Gómez, R. 2001. El estudio de casos explicativo. Una reflexión. Revista de Economía y Empresa, 41, 119‑132.

Coote, L. V.; Forrest, E. J. & Tam, T. W. 2003. An investigation into commitment in non‑Western industrial marketing relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 32 (7), 595‑604.

Cygler, J.; Gajdzik, B. & Sroka, W. 2014. Coopetition as a development stimulator of enterprises in the networked steel sector. Metalurgija, 53 (3), 383‑386.

Czernek, K., & Czakon, W. 2016. Trust‑building processes in tourist coopetition: The case of a Polish region. Tourism Management, 52, 380‑394.

Dagnino, G. & G. Padula 2002. Coopetition strategy. Paper presented at the Second European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Stockholm, May 9‑11

Della Corte, V. & M. Sciarelli 2012. Can coopetition be source of competitive advantage for strategic networks? Corporate Ownership and Control, 10 (1), 363‑379.

Domareski‑Ruiz, T.C. 2015. A dinâmica evolutiva da competitividade do destino turístico Curitiba. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia). Curitiba, Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532‑550.

Eriksson, P. E. 2008. Achieving suitable coopetition in buyer–supplier relationships: the case of AstraZeneca. Journal of Business‑to‑Business Marketing, 15 (4), 425‑454.

Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long‑term orientation in buyer‑seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 1‑19.

Gnyawali, D. R. & Park, B.J.R. 2009. Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47 (3), 308‑330

Hartley, J.F. 1994. Case studies in organizational research, en Casell, C y Symon, G. (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research. Londres, Sage Publications: pp.208‑229.

Lado, A. A.; Boyd, N. G. & Hanlon, S. C. 1997. Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), 110‑141.

Lorgnier, N. & Su, C. J. 2014. Considering coopetition strategies in sport tourism networks: a look at the nonprofit nautical sports clubs on the northern coast of France. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14 (1), 87‑109.

Luo, Y. 2005. Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40 (1), 71‑90.

Kim, S.; Kim, N.; Pae, J. H. & Yip, L. 2013. Cooperate ‘and’ compete: coopetition strategy in retailer‑supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28 (4), 263‑275.

Kylänen, M. & Rusko, R. 2011. Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä‑luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland. European Management Journal, 29 (3), 193‑205.

Kylanen, M. & M.M. Mariani 2012. Unpacking the temporal dimension of coopetition in tourism destinations: Evidence from Finnish and Italian theme parks. Anatolia, 23 (1), 61‑74.

Mayntz, R. 2001. El Estado y la sociedad civil en la gobernanza moderna. Reforma y democracia, 21, 7‑22.

Mohr, J.& Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic management journal, 15 (2), 135‑152.

Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment‑trust theory of relationship marketing. The journal of marketing, 58, 20‑38.

Narus, J. A. & Anderson, J. C. 1987. Distributor contributions to partnerships with manufacturers. Business horizons, 30 (5), 34‑42.

Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. 1976. El diferencial semántico como instrumento de medida. En: Wainerman, C. (ed.). Escalas de medición en ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión.

Porter, M. E. 1974. Consumer behavior, retailer power and performance in consumer goods industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (4), 419‑436.

Porter, M. E. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57 (2), 137‑145.

Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free Press

Ritala, P. 2012. Coopetition strategy ? when is it successful? empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23 (3), 307‑324.

Ritala, P. & Hurmelinna‑Laukkanen, P. 2009. What’s in it for me? creating and appropriating value in innovation‑related coopetition. Technovation, 29 (12), 819‑828.

Ritala, P.; Hurmelinna‑Laukkanen, P., & Blomqvist, K. 2009. Tug of war in innovation‑coopetitive service development. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12 (3), 255‑272.

Sosa‑Cabrera, S. 2003. La génesis y el desarrollo del cambio estratégico: un enfoque dinámico basado en el momentum organizativo. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

Teller, C., Alexander, A., & Floh, A. 2016. The impact of competition and cooperation on the performance of a retail agglomeration and its stores. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 6‑17.

Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “Coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science (Providence, R.I.),13 ( 2), 179‑190.

Walley, K. 2007. Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37 (2), 11‑31.

Wang, Y. 2008. Collaborative destination marketing: Roles and strategies of convention and visitors bureaus. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (3), 191‑209.

Wallenburg, C. M., & Schäffler, T. 2016. Performance measurement in horizontal LSP cooperation as a field of conflict: the preventive role of collaborative processes. Logistics Research, 9(1), 1‑15.

Wang, Y. & Krakover, S. 2008. Destination marketing: Competition, cooperation or coopetition? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2), 126‑141.

Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research. Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Published

2018-07-26

How to Cite

Chim-Miki, A. F., Batista-Canino, R. M., & Sosa-Cabrera, S. (2018). Analyzing the type of Coopetition in tourism interorganizational networks in Curitiba, Brazil. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 16(3), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.055

Issue

Section

Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted: 18% 
33%
Days to publication 
723
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Instituto Universitario de Investigación Social y Turismo. Universidad de La Laguna (España) - Instituto Universitario da Maia ISMAI (Portugal)