Estado de las relaciones del Parque Nacional Monumento Arqueologico Guayabo con las comunidades de Santa Cruz de Turrialba y Guayabo, Costa Rica

Juan A. Aguirre

doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2006.04.005

Autores

Juan A. Aguirre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2006.04.005

Palavras-chave:

participação, benefícios econômicos, encontro, gerencia de parques nacionais, costa rica

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar o estado das relações entre o Parque Na- cional Monumento Arqueológico Guayabo e as comunidades vizinhas, de Santa Cruz e Guayabo. Em Santa Cruz foram aplicadas 117 pesquisas e em Guayabo 117 em 2005. As conclusões do estudo foram: 1) o estado das relações entre o PNMNG e as comunidades de Santa Cruz e Guayabo é fraco, mas não de confronto, 2) a escassa participação e os escassos benefícios económicos recebidos, parecem ser os elementos chave que estão afetando o estado das relações entre o parque e as comunidades, 3) é urgente que a gerência do parque utilize os mecanismos comunais para dar a conhecer que faz o parque, educar e fazer com que os vizinhos participem das atividades deste e 4) a administração do parque deveria assinalar às autoridades do governo central a necessidade de envolver a comunidade, nos assuntos de parques, para garantir a sustentabilidade sócio-económica e ecológica a longo prazo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Juan A. Aguirre

Juan A Aguirre González. Ph.D. Cornell University. Economista Ambiental y de la Recreación. Profesor de Economía Ambiental y de la Recreación de la “The School for Field Studies” Asesor de Investigaciones Socioeco- nómicas del Parque Nacional Volcán Poas, Costa Rica. Coordinador de los Proyectos de Investigación Parques y Comunidades y Manejo, Economía y Administración de Áreas Protegidas del SFS..

Referências

Annis, Sheldon 1992 Poverty, Natural Resources, and Public Policy in Central America.. Overseas Development Council. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers of Rutgers University.

Ansson, Richard J. Jr. 1996 “Our National Parks—Overcrowded, Underfunded, and Besieged with a Myriad of Vexing Problems: How Can We Best Fund Our Imperiled National Park System?” Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law.

Baker, Christopher. 1994 “Costa Rica, Conservation”. Luminal Path Corporation and Contributors. <http://www.photo.net/cr/moon/conser vation>. Consultado 10 April 2005

Berg, D. 2002. “Community Park Relations: A Spatial Assessment of Impacts Focus- ing on Cariblanco in Relation to Other Surrounding Communities of VPNP.” Directed Research. The School for Field Studies. Atenas, Costa Rica.

Boza, Mario A. 1993 “Conservation in Action: Past, Present, and Future of the National Park System of Costa Rica.” Conservation Biology. 7(2): 239-247.

Chase, Alston 1989 “The Janzen heresy.” Conde Nast Traveler. November: 122-127.

Chavez, Sergio 1993 “Guayabo de Turrialba: Pasado y Presente.” Monografía. University of Costa Rica.

Cestero, Barb 1999 “Beyond the Hundredth Meeting: A Field Guide to Collaborative Conservation”. Sonoran Institute. <http://www.sonoran.org/pdfs/Hundre dth Meeting.pdf>. Consultado 10 April 2005

DeBlois, Ekulund and Thomas Blanck- Weiss. 2003 “Parks and People: The State of Relations Between Volcan Poas National Park and The Community of Bajos del Toro, Working Report No 10 English Version.” Directed Research. The School for Field Studies. Atenas, Costa Rica.

Dixon, John A. and Paul B. Sherman 1990 East West Center. Economics of Protected Areas: A New Look at Bene- fits and Costs. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Drake, Susan P. 1991 “Local Participation in Ecotourism Projects.”. In: Whelan, T., ed. Nature Tourism: Managing for the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Complications in Defining, Implementing, and Revaluating. Department of Ecological Anthropology, University of Georgia. Pp. 132-155

Eagles, Paul F. J., Stephen F. McCool, and Christopher D. Haynes 2002 Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management. Cambridge: Thanet Press Limited.

Eyre, Marcus s/f “Addressing stakeholder conflicts in a Canadian mountain park—Banff National Park and tourism management.” <http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1145/is_n9_v33/ai_21222113>. Consultado 12 April 2005

Getzner, Michael s/f “The Economic Impact of National Parks: the Perception of Rural Communities.” N.D.

Howe, J., Ed McMahon, and Luther Propst 1997 Balancing Nature and Commerce in Gateway Communities. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

La Nación 2005 January “Homenaje Vivo” 30: 2.

Muñoz, Ovidio. 2003 “Maravilla en riesgo” Al Día. November 16: 2-5.

Poffenberger, Mark 1994 “Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation.” American Ethnologist.: 435-436.

Rao, S. Kottapalli, Maikhuri K. Rakesh, and Saxena Krishna 2003 “Local Peoples’ Knowledge, Aptitude and Perceptions of Planning and Management Issues in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India.” Environmental Management: 168-181.

Young, Emily 1999 “Local People and Conservation in Mexico’s El Vizcaino Biosphere Reserve.” Geographical Re- view. 89(3): 364-390.

World Wildlife Fund for Nature. 2004 How effective are Protected Areas. A Preliminary Analysis of Forested Protected Areas. The Largest Ever Global Assessment of Protected Areas Management Effectiveness. Forest Protective Areas Initiative. WWF International Gland. Switzerland.