Epistemological and ethical dilemmas of public participation on residential tourism planning

Authors

  • Guadalupe Ortiz Noguera
  • Hugo García Andreu
  • Mª Pilar Juan Palmer
  • Antonio Aledo Tur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2007.05.023

Keywords:

Public participation, Critical perspective, Epistemological dilemmas, Legitimacy, Methodology.

Abstract

There exists a wide consensus among governance theorists about the need of broadening the level of active  engagement of  the public in  the processes  of  local planning  and  decision  making. However, the praxis of public participation still arise many doubts and uncertainties that have not been solved by the academia yet. This paper examines the problems and difficulties faced during the design and implementation of a public participation process on the alternatives and future of several local development projects of residential tourism in two municipalities in the South-East of Spain. The objective of this paper is to show the main epistemological and ethical dilemmas (legitimacy, representation and utility) challenged during this project, as well as some of the answers given to these questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guadalupe Ortiz Noguera

Ph.D Students (University of Alicante, Department of Sociology).

Hugo García Andreu

Ph.D Students (University of Alicante, Department of Sociology).

Mª Pilar Juan Palmer

Ph.D Students (University of Alicante, Department of Sociology).

Antonio Aledo Tur

Lecturer in Environmental Sociology (University of Alicante, Department of Sociology

References

Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., Gauvin, F. 2003 “Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes”. Social Science and Medicine, 57:239-251.

Adger, W.N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., Seyfang, G 2002, “Governance for Sustainability: to- wards a 'thick' understanding of environmental decisionmaking”. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 02-04. On-line document: http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/edm/edm_2002_04.htm

Aledo, A., Mazón, T., 2004. “Impact of residential tourism and the destination life cycle theory”. In: F.D. Pineda and C.A. Brebbia (Editors), Sustainable Tourism. Witpress, Wessex, pp. 25-37.

Butler, R.W., 1980. “The Concept of a Tourism Area Cycle of Evolution: Implications for Man- agement of Resources”. Canadian Geographer, 24 (1): 5-12.

Gartner, W.C., 1987. “Environmental impacts of recrea- tional home development”. Annals of Tourism Research, 14: 38-57.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., 2000. “Participatory Action Research”. In N.K.Denzin and Y.S.Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publica- tions, Inc., London, pp. 567-605.

Nogués Pedregal, A.M., 2007. “Quizás una cuestión de topología social: Moebius, la interculturalidad y los residentes europeos en Alicante”. Revista Valenciana d´Etnologia, vol.2, págs (en prensa).

Rahman, M.A., 1993. People’s self-development: perspectives on participatory action research. Zed Books – University Press Limited, Bangladesh.

Vera Rebollo, F., 1987. Turismo y urbanización en el litoral alicantino. Instituto Juan Gil Albert, Alicante.

Villasante, T.R., Montañés, M., Martín, P. (Eds) 2001. Prácticas locales de creatividad social. Construyendo ciudadanía – 2. El Viejo Topo, Barcelona

Downloads

Published

2007-10-09

How to Cite

Ortiz Noguera, G., García Andreu, H., Juan Palmer, M. P., & Aledo Tur, A. (2007). Epistemological and ethical dilemmas of public participation on residential tourism planning. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 5(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2007.05.023