A critical response to the (non-)place of rural leisure users within the counterurban imagination

Authors

  • Keith Halfacree

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2014.12.038

Keywords:

counterurbanisation, ruralleisure, mobilities, classification, rural populations.

Abstract

The concept of ‘counterurbanisation’ is now widely recognised within several branches of academia.  Over the last four decades it has come to represent the net migration of people to more rural areas, notably although not exclusively across many countries within the Global North.  It focuses on ‘permanent’ relocation, having separated itself within scholarship from more ‘temporary’ movements to rural areas, not least those undertaken for leisure purposes.  This paper addresses this intellectual positioning of counterurbanisation and its exclusion of leisure users, arguing that, in some circumstances, it may now be unhelpful.  In particular, recent discussions around the idea that we now live in an era of mobilities can lead to questioning both the idea of ‘permanent’ migration and its separation and implicit prioritisation over other forms of mobility.  This leads to the paper advocating reconciliation between rural in-migrants and rural leisure users within a much broader counterurban imagination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barcus, H. and Halfacree, K. 2012 Forthcoming An introduction to contempora- ry population geographies: lives across space. London: Routledge.

Bauman, Z. 2000 Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity. Beale, C.

“The revival of population growth in non- -metropolitan America”. United States Depart- ment of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, ERS 605.

Benson, M. 2011 The British in rural France. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. 2009 “Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration”. Sociological Review, 57: 608-25.

Berry, B. 1976 “The counterurbanization process: urban America since 1970”. In Berry, B. (Ed.) Urba- nization and counter-urbanization (pp. 17-30). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

Billig M. 1985 “Prejudice, categorization and particulariza- tion: from a perceptual to a rhetorical approach”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15:79-103.

Bunt, A. and Dowling, R.2006 Home. London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P.

Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Acts of resistance. Against the new myths of our time. Cambridge: Polity.

Boyle, P. and Halfacree, K.1998 Eds. Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues. Chichester: Wiley.

Brown, D. and Wardwell, J.1980 Eds. New directions in urban-rural migration: the population turnaround in rural America. New York: Academic Press.Buller, H. and Ho- ggart, K.

International counterurbanization. Avebury: Aldershot.

Castles, S., de Haas, H. and Miller, M. 2013 The age of migration. 5th edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Champion, A.1989 Ed. Counterurbanization: the changing pace and nature of population deconcentration. Lon- don: Edward Arnold.

“Studying counterurbanisation and the ru- ral population turnaround”. In Boyle, P. and Halfacree, K. (Eds.) Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues (pp. 21-40). Chichester: Wiley.

Cloke, P.1980 “New emphases for applied rural geography”. Progress in Human Geography, 4: 181-217.

“Counterurbanisation: a rural perspective”. Geography, 70: 13-23. Cloke, P. and Goodwin, M.

“Conceptualizing countryside change: from post-Fordism to rural structured coherence”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geo- graphers, 17: 321-36.

Clout, H. 1972 Rural geography. Oxford: Pergamon. Conradson, D. and Latham, A.

“Transnational urbanism: attending to everyday practices and mobilities”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31: 227-33.

Cresswell, T.2006 On the move. Mobility in the modern Western world. London: Routledge.

Dirksmeier, P.2008 “Strife in the rural idyll? The relationship between autochthons and in-migrants in scenic regions of Bavaria”. Erdkunde, 62: 159-71.

Fairlie, S. 2009 Low impact development. 2nd edition. Charl- bury, Oxfordshire: Jon Carpenter.

Fielding, A.1982 “Counterurbanization in Western Europe”.Progress in Planning, 17: 1-52.

“Counterurbanisation and social class” In P.

Boyle and K. Halfacree (Eds.) Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues (pp. 41-60). Wiley, Chichester.

Gallent, N.2007 “Second homes, community and a hierarchy of dwelling”. Area, 39: 97-106.

Gregory, D.1994 Geographical imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell. Halfacree, K.

“Locality and social representation: space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural”. Journal of Rural Studies, 9: 23-37.

“Talking about rurality: social representa- tions of the rural as expressed by residents of six English parishes”. Journal of Rural Studies,11: 1-20.

“Constructing the object: taxonomic practices,‘counterurbanisation’ and positioning marginal rural settlement”. International Journal of Population Geography, 7: 395-411.

a “Rural space: constructing a three-fold architecture”. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. and Mooney, P. (Eds.) Handbook of rural studies (pp. 44-62). London: Sage.

b “From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality”. Progress in Human Geography, 30: 309-36.

“To revitalise counterurbanisation research? Recognising an international and fuller picture”. Population, Space and Place, 14: 479-95.

“Rural populations”. In Kitchin, R. and Thrift, N. (Eds.) International encyclopedia of huma geography, volume 9 (pp. 442-8). Oxford: Elsevier.

“‘A solid partner in a fluid world’ and/or ‘line of flight’?: interpreting second homes in the era of mobilities”. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift,65: 144-53.

“Heterolocal identities?: counter-urbanisation, second homes and rural consumption in the era of mobilities”. Population, Space and Place,18: 209-24.

Hall, C. and Müller, D.2004 eds. Tourism, mobility and second homes. Clevedon: Channel View Publications. Ingold, T.

Being alive. Abingdon: Routledge. Johnston, R.

“Components of rural population change”. Town Planning Review, 36: 279-93. Kaltenborn, B.

“The alternative home: motives of recreation home use”. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 52: 121-34. King, R. 2002 “Towards a new map of European migration”.

International Journal of Population Geography,

: 89-106.

Law, J. and Whittaker, J. 1988 “On the art of representation: notes on the politics of visualisation”. In Fyfe, G. and Law, J. (Eds) Picturing power. Visual depiction and social relations (pp. 160-83). London: Routledge.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1848/1992 The communist manifesto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McEwan, C. 2004 “Transnationalism”. In Duncan, J., Johnson, N. and Schein, R. (Eds.) A companion to cultural geography (pp. 499-512). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-18

How to Cite

Halfacree, K. (2014). A critical response to the (non-)place of rural leisure users within the counterurban imagination. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 12(3), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2014.12.038