A Practical Application of Statistical Gap Analysis in National Park Management in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2009.07.012Keywords:
gap analysis, expectations-disconfirmation model, tourism management, national parks, costa ricaAbstract
If the tourism growth predicted materialized as tourism for Costa Rica protected areas would see major increases. A study conducted in Volcan Poas National Park and Volcan Turrialba National Park two of Costa Rica leading volcanic crater parks was undertaken to make available to national parks and protected areas managers, a procedure, that could be use: to measure using an adapted form of the expectations disconfirmation theory the satis- faction of visitors to Costa Rica national parks, and to evaluate if the results could be used for establishing the areas of the park infrastructure, services and recreational options that needed improvement and management decisions to enhance visitor's satisfaction. The sample included 1414 surveys The findings indicates that the procedure adapted base on the expectations-disconfirmation model was proven helpful in: a) getting the information to help “zero in”, the management decisions in the short and medium term and for the development of the Tourist Management Plans that is to say being developed in the 2 sites, b) guiding park managers in the resource allocation process, under the conditions of scarcity that are so common in developing countries, c) facilitating regular monitoring of the condi- tions, with a simple and quick methodology that can be used for “day to day” decisions and more sophisticated statistical analysis d) identifying the areas in the management of protected areas that need further analysis and in that way is contributing to the development of the long term socio-economic research programs in national parks, e) the “real” importance of the information and education activities in national parks, combination of activities that seems to be critical to enhance “consumer satisfaction” among the visitors to national parks everywhere and particularly as a means of understanding whether visitors needs and expectations are met, whether they receive what they should and as a context for analysis of human use on the country national parks.
Downloads
References
Akama, J.S. and Mukethe Kiety, Damiannah 2002 “Measuring tourist satisfaction with the Kenya’s wildlife safari: a case study of Tsavo West National Park”. Tourism Management. 24: 73-81.
Bitner, M.J., and Hubbert, A.R. 1994 Encounter Satisfaction versus Overall Satisfaction versus Quality: The Customer’s Voice. In Rust, R.T and Oliver, R.L.(Eds.). Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage, 72-92.
Boza, Mario 1993 “Conservation in Action: Past, Present and Future of the National Park System of Costa Rica”. Conservation Biology 7(2): 239-247.
Chang Chia Ming, Chen Chin Tsu and Hsu Chin Hsien 2002 “A Review of Service Quality in corporate and Recreational Sport/Fitness Programs”. United States Sports Academy Journal. 5(3). Reprint.13 pages
Dobles Zeledon, Juan 2001 Personal Communication. Park Director. Volcan Poas National Park.
Erevelles and Leavitt 1992 “A Comparison of Current Models of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction”. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 8: 53-58.
Ham, Sam H y Whipple, Rob 1998. Volcan Masaya National Park Visitor Profile, Nicaragua. Department of Re- source Recreation and Tourism. College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Science.
University of Idaho. Research Report. AED Order 222429-7P-068).71 pages
Ham, Sam and Weiler, Betty 2000.Perfil de los Turistas en las Areas Protegidas de la Cuenca del Canal de Panama. Eoturismo en la Cuenca del Canal de Panama. Segunda Parte. Department of Resource Recreation and Tourism. College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Science. University of Idaho. Informe Final de Investigacion. Poyecto 222429-30. 38 pages
Herrera Sibaja, Horacio 2004 Personal Communication. Park Director . Volcan Turrialaba National Park.
Hom, Willard 2000 .An Overview of Customer Satisfaction Models. R P Proceedings . Chancellor’s Office. Calfifornia Community College. Pages 99-110.
Latu, Tavite M and Everett, Andre M. 2000 Review of Satisfaction Research and Measurement Approaches. Science and Research Internal Report No 183. Department of Conservation. Wellington .N.Z. 43 pages
Leminen, Seppo 2001 Gaps in buyer seller-relationships. Management Decisions. London: 2001. Vol.39.Iss. 3; pg 180
Mackoy, R.D and Spreng, R.A. s/f The Dimensionality of Costumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction; An Empirical Examination. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Com- plaining Behavior, 9, 104-104.
National Park Services 2001 Visitor Survey Card: VSC Workbook. Survey Instructions and Guidelines and Survey Analysis and Reporting Guidelines. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 80 pages
National Park Services 1998. National Park System. Visitor Sur- vey Card Report. United States De- partment of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 1999 National Park System .Visitor Survey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 2000 National Park System .Visitor Survey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 2001. National Park System .Visitor Sur- vey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 2002 National Park System .Visitor Survey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 2003 National Park System .Visitor Survey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Services. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Park Services 2004 National Park System .Visitor Survey Card Report. United States Department of the Interior. Report Prepare by the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit for the National Park Ser- vices. Washington, D.C. 4 pages
National Quality Research Center 2004 American Consumer Satisfaction Index University of Michigan Business School. Cloes Fornell International Group and Federal Consulting Group. Natural Resource Conservation Service. Environmental Quality Incentives Pro- gram. Customer Satisfaction Study. Fi- nal Report. Michigan. 20 pages
Oliver, R.L. 1994 Conceptual Issues in the Structural Analysis of Consumption Emo- tion.Satisfaction, and Quality: Evidence in a Service Setting. In Allen, C.T and John, D.R. (Eds). Advances in Consumer Ressearch, Vol. 21. Association for Consumer Research. Provo. UT, 16-22.
Oliver, R. 1997 Satisfaction : A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw- Hill, 1997.
Oliver, R. 1999 Value as Excellence in the Consumption Experience. In M. Holbrook (Ed.), Consumer Value: A framework for Analysis and Research. 43-62, New York: Routledge.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V.A., and Berry, L.L., 1985 A Conceptual Model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49 (Fall) 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V.A., and Berry, L.L., 1988 SERVQUAL : A multiple items scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 64 (1) . 12-37.
Parks Canada. 2003 State of Protected Heritage Areas. Annual Report. (e.g., http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/links/goto_e.asp?destination=http://www.iccsisac.org/eng/cf-02.htm).
Reynolds, P.C., and Braithwaite, Dick 2002 Toward a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management.22 (2002), 31-42.
Shazo , I.R. y Monestel Vega, Luis. 1999 Costa Rica. Caracterización de los Visitantes y sus Opiniones para las Principales Areas Protegidas Publicas y Privadas. Development Discussion Papers No 689. Central American Project Series. Harvard Institute for International Development. Harvard University. 33 pages
Swan, J.E., Martin, W.S., and Trawick Jr, Frederick 2003 Compensatory Birding: An EthnograPhy of Avoiding Dissapointment and Producing Satisfaction in Birding. Journal of Consumer Sastifaction , Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior. Provo: 2003. Vol.16. pp 157-166
Tian-Cole, Shu., Crompton, J.L., and Will- son., Victor. L. 2002 An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships Between Service Quality, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions Among Visitors to a Wildlife Refugees. Journal of Leisure Reearch. 2002. Vol 34, no. 1, pp 1-24.
Yu, Larry and Goulden, Monthuya. 2005 A comparative analysis on international tourist’s satisfaction in Mongolia.
Tourism Management. Article in Press. Accepted for Publication. 16 June 2005. United Nations Environmental Program. 2005 World Data base of Protected Areas. Current Site Summary. Central America. www.sea.unep-wcmc.org/wdbpa/-statistics/region2.cfm?a Region comtains: Belice, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicargua, Panama. 11/25/2005.
Webb, Dave and Hassall, Kate 2002 Measuring visitor satisfaction in Western Australia’s conservation state. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dis- satisfaction and Complaining Behavior.Provo: 2002.Vol. 15 pg 81
Woodruff, R.B., and Gardial, S.F. 1996 Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Understanding Customer Value Satisfaction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I confirm that the work is original (of my/our authorship), and that it will not be submitted to other journals or publications until the final resolution of the review process in PASOS, RTPC.
I authorize the publication of my work by PASOS, PSTN of free and open access in any of the formats that I deem appropriate, for an indefinite period of time and as a non-remunerated collaboration.
Likewise, the author(s) understands that the published work may be linked or deposited on any server or included in other publications (republication), provided that the new place and/or new edition references the original publication and acknowledges the authorship and copyright ownership of PASOS RTPC publications.
Authors understand that a plagiarism-self-plagiarism check will be performed, and the article may be removed at any time from the editorial flow.
