Marxism and Tourism: a difficult relation.

  • Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje
Palabras clave: Tourism, Consumption, Rites of PAssage, Modernity

Resumen

This essay review centers on the role of mobilities within the nation-state, as well as the conceptual limitations of Marxism and Marxists to understand the genuine nature of tourism. Marxists, since they never turned their attention to ancient forms of tourism, grasped the possibilities tourism would serve as a platform for alienation and submission. Here we place such a posture under the critical lens of scrutiny, laying the foundations towards a new conceptualization of tourism.

Citas

Hanson, S. E. 1997. Time and revolution: Marxism and the design of Soviet institutions. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.

Harvey, D. 2007. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, USA.

Hobsbawm, E. J. 1995. The age of extremes: a history of the world, 1914-1991. New York: Pantheon Books.

Hofrichter, R. 1987. Neighborhood justice in capitalist society: The expansion of the informal state. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

James T 2012. Elite Statecraft and election administration. Bending the rules of the game?. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Korstanje M E 2017. Mobilities Paradox: a critical analysis. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

MacCannell, D. 1976. The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, Duke University Press.

Pagden, A. 1998. Lords of all the World: ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France. New Ithaca, Yale University Press.

Stilz, A (2009) Liberal Loyalty: freedom, obligation & the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Publicado
2019-04-05
Cómo citar
Korstanje, M. (2019). Marxism and Tourism: a difficult relation. PASOS Revista De Turismo Y Patrimonio Cultural, 17(2), 473-476. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2019.17.031
Sección
Opiniones y ensayos